Meditation XVII

Again I have come across something I would like to share. Written by John Donne in 1624: Meditation XVII

Perchance he for whom this bell tolls may be so ill, as that he knows not it tolls for him; and perchance I may think myself so much better than I am, as that they who are about me, and see my state, may have caused it to toll for me, and I know not that. The church is Catholic, universal, so are all her actions; all that she does belongs to all. When she baptizes a child, that action concerns me; for that child is thereby connected to that body which is my head too, and ingrafted into that body whereof I am a member. And when she buries a man, that action concerns me: all mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man dies, one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better language; and every chapter must be so translated; God employs several translators; some pieces are translated by age, some by sickness, some by war, some by justice; but God’s hand is in every translation, and his hand shall bind up all our scattered leaves again for that library where every book shall lie open to one another. As therefore the bell that rings to a sermon calls not upon the preacher only, but upon the congregation to come, so this bell calls us all; but how much more me, who am brought so near the door by this sickness. There was a contention as far as a suit (in which both piety and dignity, religion and estimation, were mingled), which of the religious orders should ring to prayers first in the morning; and it was determined, that they should ring first that rose earliest. If we understand aright the dignity of this bell that tolls for our evening prayer, we would be glad to make it ours by rising early, in that application, that it might be ours as well as his, whose indeed it is. The bell doth toll for him that thinks it doth; and though it intermit again, yet from that minute that that occasion wrought upon him, he is united to God. Who casts not up his eye to the sun when it rises? but who takes off his eye from a comet when that breaks out? Who bends not his ear to any bell which upon any occasion rings? but who can remove it from that bell which is passing a piece of himself out of this world?

No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friend’s or of thine own were: any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom the bells tolls; it tolls for thee. Neither can we call this a begging of misery, or a borrowing of misery, as though we were not miserable enough of ourselves, but must fetch in more from the next house, in taking upon us the misery of our neighbours. Truly it were an excusable covetousness if we did, for affliction is a treasure, and scarce any man hath enough of it. No man hath affliction enough that is not matured and ripened by and made fit for God by that affliction. If a man carry treasure in bullion, or in a wedge of gold, and have none coined into current money, his treasure will not defray him as he travels. Tribulation is treasure in the nature of it, but it is not current money in the use of it, except we get nearer and nearer our home, heaven, by it. Another man may be sick too, and sick to death, and this affliction may lie in his bowels, as gold in a mine, and be of no use to him; but this bell, that tells me of his affliction, digs out and applies that gold to me: if by this consideration of another’s danger I take mine own into contemplation, and so secure myself, by making my recourse to my God, who is our only security.

Why? Well, even though it is heavily impregnated with some kind of religious cult – in this instance christanity – there are some very fine ideas to be found within the text. That should explain my motivation.

2 thoughts on “Meditation XVII

  1. Kip Watson

    Donne is a marvellous Christian, nearly as great and subtle a poet-philosopher as St Paul himself.

    Christianity is absolutely saturated with ‘great ideas’ (and much else that is great) — that this is not more widely appreciated is our fault, the Christians.

    Sorry.

    But remember also, that the bell tolls to bring men and women to worship God. Because it is our shared spiritual essence that binds us.

    That bell tolls for you too, Bob.

    And if you can’t stand Christians (and I understand; the meek, the heavy laden, those who mourn, the poor in spirit, the broken hearted, the reviled, sure they can be a bit much), Christ calls us, not to any particular church, but to Him.

    Reply
  2. Bob Hentges Post author

    Christianity is absolutely saturated with ‘great ideas’ (and much else that is great) — that this is not more widely appreciated is our fault, the Christians.

    Yup. There are good ideas in the Christian religion. There are also bad ideas in the Christian religion.

    In the same way that there are good things and bad in Muslem religions.

    But remember also, that the bell tolls to bring men and women to worship God. Because it is our shared spiritual essence that binds us.

    Nope, total nonacceptance from my side here.

    That bell tolls for you too, Bob.

    Ya, the bell tolls for me too. Which means I’ll die one day. And? There is no need to be tragic about it. It is a fate we all share. It can’t be avoided.

    Believing in some deity might help you cope with the fatality that you will end up there. You can imagine some nice things for you in your afterlife. But it won’t help you escape this scenario.

    And if you can’t stand Christians (and I understand; the meek, the heavy laden, those who mourn, the poor in spirit, the broken hearted, the reviled, sure they can be a bit much), Christ calls us, not to any particular church, but to Him.

    I have nothing against Christians. I have something against Christians who try to set their believe on to other people. I have something against the fact that religion is still partly immune to criticism because if you question a religion you are directly attacking somebodies believe and opinion.

    Can’t do that, can you? How rude would that be?

    I hate the fact that certain religious believes are supposed to explain our surroundings. That the theory of creationism is still accepted as a possibility in certain countries.

    I hate the fact that the Christian religion can’t have a clearer stance on certain points. They are always retreating in a very unattractive way. They make it impossible to nail them down on a topic.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>